Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC
Consultation Update No. 2
Trans Mountain Expansion Project
July 2014
Page 65
TABLE 1.5.6-9
OPEN HOUSE – BURNABY, BC
Region
Location
Date
Number of
Attendees
Lower Mainland/Fraser
Valley
Executive Plaza, North Road,
Coquitlam, BC
April 3, 2014
146
TABLE 1.5.6-10
OPEN HOUSE – BURNABY, BC
Topic
Summary of New Key Issues/Concerns
Land
•
Concern about Colony Farms; impact on wildlife, estuary, amphibians , reptiles,
birds, mammals
•
City of Coquitlam Councillor has received a lot of negative feedback about
routing through this area; City of Councillor has been asked whether the City of
Coquitlam would need to rezone the area for a pipeline to run through a park
•
Routing through Colony Farms Regional Park; mitigation has been done in
Colony Farms Park related to previous projects; proposed pipeline expansion
could destroy previous mitigation; Park use is second highest in greater
Vancouver area for Metro Vancouver parks, only behind Pacific Spirit Park
•
Some unusual species including King bird, Barn owl, Hawks, Lazalui bunting use
the hedgerows
•
Grassland species in Colony Farms Park
Air
•
No new issues raised
Water
•
No new issues raised
Human Activity &
Land Use
•
Although mitigation may be able to repair the temporary impact, the construction
impact (
i.e.,
noise, vehicles) may drive some animals away permanently
1.5.7
Online Engagement
Table 1.4.13-4 documents the advertising Trans Mountain conducted to notify stakeholders about online
feedback opportunities and encouraged attendance at upcoming public events. The campaign included
print advertising and direct mail postcard drop. Online engagement opportunities were also promoted via
the @TransMtn Twitter account and through an eblast to all stakeholders in the Trans Mountain contact
database.
Additional advertising was placed specifically to notify stakeholders of the online engagement opportunity
following the open houses.
From March 17 to April 17, 2014, an online survey and feedback from requesting comments from
stakeholders on routing optimization and the proposal to returning a section of existing Trans Mountain
pipeline to service, was available on the Trans Mountain website. Supporting materials were provided for
visitors to review and provide comment on. Materials made available online are located in Appendix G. As
a result of this online engagement opportunity, Trans Mountain received 85 feedback forms. Table 1.5.7-1
summarizes the number of visitors, feedback forms submitted and document views related to online
engagement.
TABLE 1.5.7-1
ON-LINE ENGAGEMENT FEEDBACK
Number of Visitors
Number of Feedback Forms Submitted
Number of Related Document
Views
6,975
85
543
