No.
Conditions with initial filings due during construction / prior to
commencing operations
CPCN
OC2
OC49
Temp
Pump1
Pump2
Tanks
Deact
National Energy Board
478
121
(cont)
ii)
At least 3 months prior to applying for leave to open Line 2
, a supplement to
the report described in b)i) that provides verification of any third party liability
insurance coverage, a copy of the insurance certificate, and a summary of the
insurance policy's key features. This summary must include: limits on insurance
coverage, deductible amounts, the risks and perils and properties covered by the
insurance policy, the exclusions from coverage, Trans Mountain's obligations,
effective dates, and names of insurers and reinsurers.
iii)
With its first leave to open application for Line 2
, a report describing the steps
it took to eliminate any deficiencies in its Financial Assurances Plan that were
identified in the independent third party report referenced in b)i) and the NEB's
subsequent review.
iv)
On or before 31 January of each year after commencing operations
, a letter
signed by an officer of the company verifying that all components of the
Financial Assurances Plan remain as the NEB approved and sufficient to meet
the financial assurance coverage levels described in ii).
v)
At least 2 months prior to any intended change(s) to the Financial Assurances
Plan during the Projects operations phase
, a letter, for approval, detailing the
intended change(s) and how the change(s) provides the same or greater level
of protection.
vi)
Within 30 days after accessing any component of the Financial Assurances
Plan
, a report detailing the component accessed, the reason for accessing it, and
Trans Mountain’s plan to ensure that it continues to meet the requirements of its
NEB-approved Financial Assurances Plan.
X
X
X
X
X
122
Changing pipeline segment operating conditions (Hinton to Hargreaves;
Darfield to Black Pines)
Trans Mountain must file with the NEB for approval,
at least 6 months prior to
applying for leave to open Line 2
, the following:
a) An engineering assessment in accordance with CSA Z662 for the above two
pipeline segments which Trans Mountain proposes to change from operating on
the existing TMPL to the proposed Line 2.
The engineering assessment must demonstrate that the two pipeline segments are
fit for their intended service under the operating conditions of Line 2, and that they
meet all relevant requirements of CSA Z662. The engineering assessment must
include a schedule of planned integrity monitoring activities.
b) A certificate with a supporting report issued by an independent certification
body,
88
stating unconditionally that the 43-kilometre-long, 762 millimetre
outside diameter (NPS 30) pipeline segment from Darfield to Black Pines,
British Columbia is fit for its intended service under the operating conditions
89
of Line 2.
The supporting report must include the qualifications of the independent
certification body and the justification used to grant the certificate
X
1
2
88 For Conditions 19, 122 and 152, an” independent certification body” is an internationally recognized company or organization, such as Lloyd’s Register
or Det Norske Veritas, which is able to certify compliance to statutory requirements. The independent certification body must have expertise in
pipeline integrity. The NEB reserves the right to accept or reject the certificate. In addition, the NEB’s decision is not contingent on the results of the
certificate.
89 For Conditions 19, 122 and 152, “operating conditions” must include the Project-specific operating conditions, possible transient flow conditions, slack
flow conditions, and effects on operating pressure due to temperature changes.